<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.j-source.ca/english_new/styles/RssDisplay.xslt" type="text/xsl"?>
    <rss version="2.0">
      <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[J-Source - Articles | Contempt of court]]></title>
        <link>http://www.j-source.ca</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright><![CDATA[http://www.j-source.ca]]></copyright>
        <generator>N/A</generator>
        <webMaster>nospam@mail.com</webMaster>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:31:51 MDT</lastBuildDate>
      
        <ttl>20</ttl>

          <item>
            <title><![CDATA[CP fined for breaching ban]]></title>
            <link>http://www.j-source.ca/english_new/detail.php?id=4096</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<font size="2"></font><strong><em>News </em></strong><br/>The Canadian Press has been fined $4,000 for contempt of court for breaching a publication ban imposed at a British Columbia murder trial last year. The wire service circulated a report that used the first name of an undercover RCMP officer whose identity was protected under a court-ordered ban. The CP reporter covering the case was aware of the ban but assumed the name used to identify the officer in court was a pseudonym; it turned out to be the officer's real name. The ruling will be of particular interest to online journalists, as the report appeared on only a handful of websites before CP realized its mistake, killed the story and apologized to the court. Read the <em>Vancouver Sun</em> <a href="http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Canadian+Press+fined+breaching+murder+trial/1817466/story.html">report</a>. Read the <a href="http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/SC/09/09/2009BCSC0988.htm">ruling</a>.]]></description>
            <author>no@spam.com (Dean Jobb)</author>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:28:33 MDT</pubDate>
           <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.j-source.ca/english_new/detail.php?id=4096</guid>
          </item>

        

          <item>
            <title><![CDATA[TV station in contempt for ban breach]]></title>
            <link>http://www.j-source.ca/english_new/detail.php?id=750</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<strong><em>News</em></strong><br/><br/>A British Columbia television station has been fined $2,000 after pleading guilty to violating a court order shielding the identity of an undercover police officer. Kelowna-based CHBC Television��showed the��officer with her face obscured, but the court order prohibited the publication or broadcast of &#8220;any likeness&#8221; of undercover officers called as witnesses. The <a href="http://www.canlii.org/bc/cas/bcsc/2007/2007bcsc74.html" target="_blank">ruling</a> said there was a &#8220;significant risk&#8221; of recognition, which could jeopardize her undercover work and her safety. Read CHBC&#8217;s <a href="http://www.chbc.com/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=13694" target="_blank">news report</a> on the case.]]></description>
            <author>no@spam.com (Dean Jobb)</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:27:06 MST</pubDate>
           <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.j-source.ca/english_new/detail.php?id=750</guid>
          </item>

        

          <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Was the BBC right to broadcast interview with murder suspect?]]></title>
            <link>http://www.j-source.ca/english_new/detail.php?id=474</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<em><strong>Feature</strong></em><br/>Did the BBC risk running afoul of Britain's contempt of court laws when it aired an interview with a suspect in the Suffolk prostitute murders? BBC media correspondent Torin Douglas <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6195197.stm">reports</a>.]]></description>
            <author>no@spam.com (Dean Jobb)</author>
            <pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:27:20 MST</pubDate>
           <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.j-source.ca/english_new/detail.php?id=474</guid>
          </item>

        

          <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Trial by journalist]]></title>
            <link>http://www.j-source.ca/english_new/detail.php?id=241</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<strong><em>Feature</em></strong><br/>In Canada, you're innocent until proven guilty. You wouldn't know it from reading some of Christie Blatchford's columns on high-profile trials. Mike Drach of the <i>Ryerson Review of Journalism</i> explains how one journalist has pushed the limits of the law of contempt of court.]]></description>
            <author>no@spam.com (Dean Jobb)</author>
            <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:27:35 MDT</pubDate>
           <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.j-source.ca/english_new/detail.php?id=241</guid>
          </item>

        
          </channel>
        </rss>
      